That remains Gallipoli's enduring appeal. He is at his best, however, in explaining and presenting the "near-superhuman courage and endurance" of the combatants. Peter Hart Battlefield Tours Turkish Memorial Helles French Guns W Beach Just returned from Gallipoli I have to say it was a truly fantastic week. Ian Hamilton's on-the%E2%80%93spot fecklessness. Peter Hart Battlefield Tours runs small guided tours to the first world war Gallipoli battlefield in Turkey. Hart excoriates the haphazard romanticism of First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill. The Turkish army, on the other hand, profited from its defeat in the Balkan War of 1911%E2%80%931912 and from its military relationship with Germany the Turkish army won the battle of Gallipoli even more than the Allies lost it, according to Hart. The often-overlooked French were effective, but poorly used on the Helles front. Troops were poorly trained and badly led. Such alleged strategic benefits as reducing pressure on Russia, says Hart, were largely ephemeral. But the human element still defines this compelling account of an operation Hart dismisses as a "lunacy that never could have succeeded," driven by wishful thinking as opposed to the professional analysis of ends and means. This book depends more on archival work and on recent Turkish and French research than Hart's earlier collaboration with Nigel Steelin, Defeat at Gallipoli. Hart, oral historian of Britain's Imperial War Museum, focuses on the Gallipoli campaign.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |